In the 1990s, cell phones were giants. There was still a long way to go in terms of miniaturization, and the early 2000s meant a lot of breakthroughs in this regard as phones got smaller, and therefore lighter and easier to manage. The subsequent boom in camera phones and some multimedia capabilities has caused them to grow again to better take advantage of these new possibilities.
The arrival of iOS and Android, and its evolution until today, go hand in hand with terminals with increasingly large touch screens, in the sense of the search for manageability of 2002-2005, when it was very common to find many phones that were less than three centimeters high. The current standard is around sixteen.
A rare concept
The increase in the average size of our phones is also understandable as it is evident that those of us who manage mobile phones have remained sold. The era of frameless phones, launched by Essential (DEP) three years ago, did not serve to maintain the sizes then prevalent in the market and to increase the diagonal of the screens. It was used to make phones just as big, if not bigger, and to dramatically increase the size of the panels.
The result, the one we know: that screens between 5 and 5.5 inches are considered “small” and that the size of phones has exploded even more in recent years. The trend has been on the rise since 2004, but over the past three years finding smartphones that are less than 14 centimeters tall has been difficult. If we also want it to be high or mid-high end, good luck and see you later, what Calamaro would say.
I fell in love with huge mobiles a few years ago. Its battery, more resistant than that of the small ones; its good multimedia experience and the fact that the differential characteristics were previously only found in them (multiple lenses, portrait modes, etc.) was a satisfactory result to lose the manageability of yesteryear.
With a few honorable exceptions, compact phones have been relegated to entry-level phones.
However, the small model battery (or what used to be big and now considered small) is usually enough, at a minimum, to get to the end of the day without going through an outlet. On the flip side, now that the enthusiasm for smartphones has already subsided and we’ve gotten used to it, maybe it’s time to assume that it might not be that common to see films about them, a reason often used to justify the choice of giant models; This is why televisions are used for, or during long trips, tablets; and that the videos we usually see on mobile are more on YouTube than on film.
Or not, of course, everyone has their reasons. But beyond the fact that the market has spoken clearly and that manufacturers are doing what is best for their balance sheets – more is needed -, I refuse to believe that we are just four cats who want a premium phone, no compromise -or the righteous- and that we can handle a hand.
Phones up to 13.14 cm high, that they differ from giants only in their size, but retain their abilities. No two step processor below. No mid-range cameras. No design from five years ago. No rough screens.
Naturally, the miniaturization in the filling of many components of small phones complicates the equation. Ultimately, larger phones not only allow for larger screens, but they also provide more space for circuit installation. But if the equivalent of an XL mobile cannot come, unless it is similar, and fair commitments are made.
Commitments on the one hand
I often live in situations where I recognize myself wishing I could go back to the days when cell phones were customary. At least as an alternative to those who dominate the market today. When you are walking on the street, when using public transport, you need to use the phone with something else, like a coffee or an umbrella. Situations in which the use of a mobile with one hand, without requiring the other, is appreciated.
In contrast, we arrived in 2020 with a certain current of thought that has taken hold in the minds of some users (myself included): cell phones have become permanent distractions, black holes for our attention and our focus. Reducing their size could be another way of feeling less dedicated to them and subconsciously limiting their use, the opposite of what has happened in recent years.
Other demographics and collectives might also benefit from phones that give them what they want (high-end, why not) in sizes that make their lives easier. Blind people, for example, who use their phones with accessibility tools and don’t care about screen size… but not that terminal updates stop coming after a sigh. Or people with some form of motor impairment, for whom one-handed handling can be more than a whim, can make the difference between being able to use their phone or not.
The problem for compact phone enthusiasts: platforms and applications have adapted too well to a world with giant mobiles
If it is true that This latest boom in higher and higher mobiles has also meant narrower mobiles Due to the change to 18: 9 or 19: 9 aspect ratio, increasing screen diagonals when using (almost) the entire available front minimized the effect that this width reduction could have had .
I am aware that we live in a world where compact phones have no return in the medium term, and that the applications that give phones meaning have adapted to these new sizes, making the return to manageability even more complicated. . I’ll keep dreaming, and in the same way that vinyl ended up returning to the streaming age or the makers of video game consoles made their month of August by allowing us to replay titles from there to 30 years, at some point there will be a certain market trend that warrants the return of attention to compact terminals. In the meantime, we’ll be content with what some manufacturers continue to roll out from time to time.